The USA today seems intent on proving Heinlein right!Īs the 21st century comes to a close, Nehemiah Scudder is First Prophet. The rise of Al-Qaeda and the earlier rise of Soviet communism can also be explained using the same social symptoms. In an epiloguecal aside, Heinlein states that he will never write a direct story about Scudder because he dislikes him so much, but he goes into an interesting explanation about his ideas for the possibility, if not probability, of a Scudder like emergence in our culture. The Future History of RAH is sprinkled liberally with mention of them both, and so for a devoted fan of Heinlein, this is a must read.ĭivided into three loosely connected parts, the first tells the tale of the end of the theocracy Scudder started. Any serious reader of RAH will want to know more about Nehemiah Scudder and the origins of Andrew Jackson Libby, and both can be found in the pages of Revolt in 2100. Revolt in 2100 is not at all a bad Heinlein, though, it is quite good. I am going to join with Spider Robinson and so many other literary critics who populate the science fiction genre of literature in stating that a bad Heinlein novel is still better than a “good” novel by most anyone else.
0 kommentar(er)
